Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 02:51:41 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 23:24:57, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 23, 2000 at 20:06:27, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On January 23, 2000 at 19:55:08, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>It doesn't look like I can change Bob Hyatt's mind about Deep Blue, so there's >>>really no point in arguing. I have other things to do with my time. >>> >>>I still firmly believe that Hyatt has overhyped DB, but there's nothing I can do >>>about it. >>> >>>I would be happy to discuss DB via private e-mail, if anybody is still >>>interested. >>> >>>-Tom >> >>Well let's not forget Bob is the only one defending deep blue here. > >Depends on what you mean. I believe its play was inconsistent and would have >been considerably better had it been better tuned. That said, I also believe It definitely made some 'computer-looking' moves. >that it had no peers by a long shot. Saying the program could have been better >than its minimum 2650 strength isn't much of a put-down when the best >competition is still trying to prove it's at 2500. It seems many people just like to think their Ford Pinto can go faster than an F1 race-car. :| >Put me on your list if you >please. I'd love to see any analysis you might have. > > Albert Silver > >>I'll add you to my CC list if i have tested/produced again some analysis >>at the kasparov-deep blue matches. I would also like to see any analysis. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.