Author: Amir Ban
Date: 06:57:58 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2000 at 09:25:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 24, 2000 at 06:17:37, Amir Ban wrote: > >>I'll bet I have one or two good evaluation terms that Deep-Blue doesn't have. >>I'll also bet that I have a few that are not practical for them to compute. We >>are really in a symmetrical situation. It's true that their context is different >>from mine, but it's equally true that mine is different from theirs. > >I suspect this is true of all. But the point still is, that they can do >_anything_ they want. At zero cost. We can't... With us, it is a matter >of trading search speed for knowledge content. For them it is a matter of >trading _nothing_ for knowledge content. Which is a big advantage... > You can't agree and disagree with me in the same breath. This is the opposite of what I've said. Let me repeat for your sake: "I'll bet that I have several evaluation terms that are not practical for them to compute." Amir
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.