Author: Brian Richardson
Date: 07:09:49 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 19:55:08, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >It doesn't look like I can change Bob Hyatt's mind about Deep Blue, so there's >really no point in arguing. I have other things to do with my time. > >I still firmly believe that Hyatt has overhyped DB, but there's nothing I can do >about it. > >I would be happy to discuss DB via private e-mail, if anybody is still >interested. > >-Tom Until now I have not voiced an opinion on the DB issue. However, I hope Bob Hyatt is not alone as a proponent of DB! I was at game two of the 2nd match. My chess is mediocre, but in the group at the hotel were many chess experts. It was clear that "something" had changed since the first game, but not clear that it was DB, his opponent, or whatever. Perhaps some eval function, or book, or whatever changes were made. No matter. What was clear is that the program was "patient" and that GK was "ground down" by the unrelenting machine. Again, my chess (and my program Tinker) are just beginners, but I got the distinct impression from the audience (understandably somehwat pro IBM), that DB was awsome. Could DB beat anyone? Who knows. It DID beat GK rather convincingly. Did he take it "seriously". I think yes, until it was clear he could not win. His statements after the last game (also "unfortunate" to be there) were insulting. I defer to Bob's technical knowledge of speeds and feeds. But again, just think about the predecessor's capabilities given the technology of the day. Also think about the parallelism and nps and hardware eval. I shudder. My personal OPINION is that a 2002/03 technology-based version of DB would be world champion. However, until the $$$ is there, nobody will build it. I have spoken to the head of R&D at HP, and senior folks at other vendors. They won't bother because "IBM has been there done that". Any future progress I think will have to come from within the chess community. Perhaps enough visceral statements will goad a sponsor into underwriting a new implementation. Whew, I feel better now. Respectfully, Brian Richardson PS Tom and Bob: I greatly admire both of your contributions to comp chess. Without you (and Tim Mann) as "mentors" I probably would not have stayed with it. Thank you VERY much. It is somewhat startling that for such a cold calculating game (of complete information), that there is so much emotion in chess...at least amongst the non (C) players :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.