Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:10:38 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2000 at 09:31:13, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 23, 2000 at 18:49:51, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On January 23, 2000 at 17:54:07, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On January 23, 2000 at 16:14:20, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>> >>>:-)) >> >>This is the intriguing part. For some posters the number of smileys is directly >>proportional to the aggressivity of their posts. I always wondered about it and >>never dared to ask... >> >>Enrique > >Then we are two. The first thing I thought after reading the post was "How can >someone write this and follow it up with a smiley?" Is the recipient of the >criticism supposed to send smileys back? I can just see the exchange: > >"It is strange that anyone could believe such a thing when the rest of the world >has already moved on to greater intelectual depths. It is only a pity you were >not able to accompany this evolution. :-))" > >"Yes, it is no doubt I who suffer from intellectual retardedness when you can't >even write 'intellectual' correctly. Try going back to grade school. :-)))))" > >"My grade school is probably the equivalent of your graduate program, but don't >worry. Your condition may be curable through a minor lobotomy. LOL. :-)))))))))" > >"If by that you mean that we use your grade school students as lab mice in our >graduate labs, you are quite correct. :-)))))))))))))) BTW, a lobotomy wouldn't >help yours as there has to be something to remove in the first place. <chortle> >LOL!!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))) ;-))))))))))))))))) <handshake>" > > Albert Silver :))) And I mean it. This is my "post of the week" and it is not exaggerated in any way. I have seen even worse insults followed by lots of smileys, as if the poster were a sadist, laughing while stabbing. I thought that a smiley was friendly. How naive... Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.