Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: peaceful as a lamb

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 08:16:24 01/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 24, 2000 at 10:57:38, Harald Faber wrote:

>On January 24, 2000 at 10:01:35, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On January 24, 2000 at 06:06:45, Michael Cummings wrote:
>>>I saw a pic of Thorsten and Chris W, they seem to be friends. Maybe there is
>>>something going on here in trying to corrupt this forum.
>>
>>:-)))
>>
>>It was not me using bad language or insulting. it was harald.
>
>Not one word.
>
>>i thought this is ONE computerchess-world and we are all a big family.
>>it should be possible and allowed to put the ssdf-nose on certain facts
>>without other members of this group exploding in uncontrolled
>>and insulting remarks.
>
>Show me one.
>
>>this is uncivilized in my opinion, although it is very typical for human
>>beeings.
>>
>>my points were constructive.
>
>Very funny but not true.
>
>>i see no reason to take anything back.
>
>No? Let me remind you. YOU wrote:
>
>>>
>1. you let the new versions play against older versions of the same
>program , or let the same program play on fast machines against
>slower machines. thats nonsense.
>
>
>HF: Very friendly words.
>
>
>2. you don't delete the doubles ! here you even count 12x the same opening !!!
>
>
>HF: Only 3 exclamation marks, nice of you.
>
>
>3. you only let the new programs play against new other software
>(or - as stupid, see point 1). But you never test against a big
>variety of programs on same fast hardware.
>
>therefore your results are ot serious.
>
>die schwedische eloliste ist nicht mehr das was sie einmal war.
>the autoplayers have not only brought us advantages. it seems
>they had very negative effects on you.
>>>
>
>
>"...very negative effects on you."
>Stress is "... ON YOU" which goes definitely into the personal direction.
>
>Indeed a normal, CONSTRUCTIVE and not insulting or offending post.
>
>Maybe you like to answer my questions you haven't answered yet:
>1. Which of the both programs is old in your opinion, Junior6 or Tiger 12?
>2. How do you call a guy falling 20 times into the same trap again and again?

 1. Maybe Junior6 can be considered as *a bit* old. Just upgraded the program.
    Roumers tell that Tiger interface looks somewhat *old*...

 2. Oh, that must be Mr Trapman himself! From one of the kiddies books.
    "Long and tall likely to fall"

    Sorry, just couldn't resist...

    Greetings to you all
    Sune



>
>And the hardware issue, you seem to have no good memory, was answered many
>times. So why do you ask the same question again and again?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.