Author: walter irvin
Date: 09:02:26 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 19:55:08, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >It doesn't look like I can change Bob Hyatt's mind about Deep Blue, so there's >really no point in arguing. I have other things to do with my time. > >I still firmly believe that Hyatt has overhyped DB, but there's nothing I can do >about it. > >I would be happy to discuss DB via private e-mail, if anybody is still >interested. > >-Tom well i can prove that db is not better than pc programs , at least vs computers .my proof is based on an experiment that was done on my computer and also on hitec i believe .what i did was took cm 4000 made a modified version that was materialistic completely .i played it vs regular 4000 at 4ply vs 4 ply and 4000 won as expected .but then i gave mod ver 5 ply vs 4ply 4000 .they scored about equal .then 6 ply vs 4 ply mod ver won .7 ply vs 4 ply was even bigger win .my point is that in computer vs computer matches the deeper search wins .so if a strong program like cm6000 or junior 6 ect were ran a speeds like 200,000,000 nps then they would spank deep blue .its the depth that kills plus the pc programs have good enough evals .if deep blue's hardware could be translate to mhz then at equal mhz pc's win .im not sure if pc's would be better vs people ????maybe the extra knowledge would help deep blue??????????????????
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.