Author: Harald Faber
Date: 10:20:03 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2000 at 12:17:09, Thorsten Czub wrote: >this says that using the autoplayer makes the people unable to feel >that WHAT they count is not making any sense. >do you believe if they would have to play the games by hand, >they would have played the game 12 times again ?? IIRC it was written that the games were not exactly the same. >>Maybe you like to answer my questions you haven't answered yet: >>1. Which of the both programs is old in your opinion, Junior6 or Tiger 12? > >why shall i answer you questions that have nothing to do with >what i posted. >YOU believe i did refer to the junior-tiger games in all my 3 points. >i did not referred to it. Of course not, you only replied to the match result. :-) >>2. How do you call a guy falling 20 times into the same trap again and again? > >its not the question if i would call such a guy stupid or not. You cannot deny that such a behaviour is stupid. >the question is if this really measures the chess-strength in elo ! >i do not believe this measures chess-strength. >you may believe it. Come on and define "chess-strength". I am sure we have different points of view what it is. Question is: who has the "right" definition? >>And the hardware issue, you seem to have no good memory, was answered many >>times. So why do you ask the same question again and again? > >because it remains wrong. >let them test all programs on 450 and ok with me. Very friendly of you and very tolerant. If they do it YOUR way then it is OK. Really funny. They have given good, understandable and reasonable arguments. A pity that YOu don't accept them. >IMO they do often not measure chess strength but something different. And, what do they measure?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.