Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Back ontopic

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 12:02:35 01/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 24, 2000 at 13:20:03, Harald Faber wrote:
>>YOU believe i did refer to the junior-tiger games in all my 3 points.
>>i did not referred to it.

>Of course not, you only replied to the match result. :-)

but i wrote 3 points. sentences. words. you should better
read the words instead making conclusions from the headline
(that was the same - right !) !
I always thought people read the words, and not only shoot out
of their mind, what THEY think what somebody WOULD say.

>You cannot deny that such a behaviour is stupid.

i would call both...

>Come on and define "chess-strength".

sure. when you believe you repeating 20 times the same
game would make you stronger than me falling 20 times in
the same trap. than we have different point of views about
strength.


>I am sure we have different points of view what it is.
>Question is: who has the "right" definition?

i am sure YOUR definition is more materialistic.

>Very friendly of you and very tolerant.

?
can an advise to test on nearly latest (today it's 700 Mhz or even more!!)
harware be intolerant ?

> If they do it YOUR way then it is OK.

no - if they do it how it has to be done to be ok.
they can of course try it out on an XT, but this would not
produce sensible results.



>Really funny.

really ?
i cannot laugh when i see them post shredder2 on p/200 against
xyz playing x:y results.

this is not funny.
i don't want to be more personal.

>They have given good, understandable and reasonable arguments. A pity that YOu
>don't accept them.

do you remember when the p/200 came out on the market ? i mean: which
year !! remember: today is 2000 !!!

>And, what do they measure?

good question. i don't really know. maybe how long
the move-generator of program A needs to fill the piece-square-tables,
or how long program B needs to draw the board on screen.
whatever they measure. its IMO out of range of the sensible area to accept
it.
shredder3 would be ok. on 450mhz.
but not shredder2 on 200.

again: you are allowed to have different ideas about this.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.