Author: Pete Galati
Date: 15:10:56 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2000 at 15:51:32, Fernando Villegas wrote: >On January 24, 2000 at 15:07:49, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On January 24, 2000 at 14:17:16, Eelco de Groot wrote: >> >>> >>>On January 24, 2000 at 12:30:19, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>> >>>>On January 24, 2000 at 09:43:11, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>> >>>>>Having had a go at writing a review on Chessmaster II for the playstation, I >>>>>think that anyone here if they spent some time could write and edit a review or >>>>>article about Computer chess. >>>>> >>>>>I spent an hour doing mine, which was not long, and I am certain that maybe >>>>>spending a small amount of time over few days writing some drafts then making it >>>>>sound better and posting it is not to demanding. >>>>> >>>>>I am sure I could have done much more and better if I spent a small amount of >>>>>time over a few days to expand on what I had. >>>>> >>>>>With Fritz6, Rebel Century, Chess Tiger, CM7K and other on the market, I think >>>>>it would be good if people here tried at writing something. >>>>> >>>>>Then maybe they will be good enough to get the Chess reports section happening >>>>>again. >>>>> >>>>>I say just have a go, and post it on here. >>>> >>>> >>>>Dear Pal: >>>>I did more than my share in WCCR, without an adquate feedback. It is like what >>>>you writes does not matter to almost anybody. But there is one more reason not >>>>to do it: in a place like this, where anythig abut a proram is discussed even >>>>before release, there is not much room for an article where you would just say >>>>things known lot time before. Articles were OK in pre-internet, pre-ccc times. >>>>Now it is >>>>somewhat obsolete. >>>>Fernando >>> >>>I'm sorry that I can't agree with you here, Fernando. I kind of liked Michael >>>doing a review and we wouldn't want to discourage him? I don't know much about >>>ChessMaster and it is always nice to see that people can be enthusiastic and >>>want to share that with others. At least our own opinions are an offset to the >>>mediahype we sometimes have to read. So by ways of feedback:"I would like to see >>>more posts like Michael's ChessMaster for the Playstation review. Thanks". >>> >>> Eelco >> >>If somebody felt like organizing such an effort, maybe CCC could have a page >>where members could submit their own individual reviews of a program. For an >>example of how that could posibly work, see this page from Harmony Central where >>people can submit reviews of guitar amplifiers, this is a good thing because it >>gives musicians a wide variety of opinions before plunking down their hard cash >>for a major investment: http://www.harmonycentral.com/Guitar/Data/ >> >>It's a great resource for opinions on music equipment, probably not such a bad >>idea for Chess software. >> >>Pete > >Hi pete: >That space already exist and it is WCCR. And I tried hard to keep it alive. If >you look at it you will see literary dozens of articles writen by me, >interviews, reviews, funny comemnts, etc. And beside I almost implored people to >add his efforts and the same did steven and nobody answered, except half a dozen >freaks like us. So my purpose is not to discourage Michael, but just explain him >that such effort never will get into the heart of most people here. Yes, they >maybe are prepared to read, but surely not for writting. >fernando I guess that's a page I've been ignoring (sorry), that's a very extensive list of reviews. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.