Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:06:05 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2000 at 15:02:35, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>YOU believe i did refer to the junior-tiger games in all my 3 points. >>>i did not referred to it. > >>Of course not, you only replied to the match result. :-) > >but i wrote 3 points. sentences. words. you should better >read the words instead making conclusions from the headline >(that was the same - right !) ! >I always thought people read the words, and not only shoot out >of their mind, what THEY think what somebody WOULD say. :-) I fear you believe what you write. Really hopeless. Let me try to explain it to you: You answer to a post, that means you REFER to it. >>You cannot deny that such a behaviour is stupid. > >i would call both... No, the other one is clever to repeat winning lines. >>Come on and define "chess-strength". > >sure. when you believe you repeating 20 times the same >game would make you stronger than me falling 20 times in >the same trap. than we have different point of views about >strength. I didn't say stronger but it is more clever. BTW where is your definition of chess-strength? YOu still avoid answering my questions and I wonder why. >>Very friendly of you and very tolerant. > >? >can an advise to test on nearly latest (today it's 700 Mhz or even more!!) >harware be intolerant ? If it were an advice...it was a harsh criticism. >> If they do it YOUR way then it is OK. > >no - if they do it how it has to be done to be ok. Here YOU define HOW it has to be done, so again it is your way... >i cannot laugh when i see them post shredder2 on p/200 against >xyz playing x:y results. Because you don't understand. Even Christophe explained that to you. >>They have given good, understandable and reasonable arguments. A pity that YOu >>don't accept them. > >do you remember when the p/200 came out on the market ? i mean: which >year !! remember: today is 2000 !!! Wow! 2000! I guess I have to buy now a K7-800 or P3-500 to play valid games, correct? Isn't it possible for you to accept that there are people who aren't either willing or able to pay much money for nowadays up-to-date hardware? The "outdated" hardware P200 is still OK. You give them a too important meaning. If J6/450-Shr2/200 wins 15-5 it does not say that J6 is stronger than F6 if F6/450 wins only 14-6 against Shr2/200. So why all the hype? Go back reading Christophes answer, I am not willing to repeat it again and again. >again: you are allowed to have different ideas about this. Are you allowed to criticize the SSDF methods of testing? Maybe, but you are blind and one-track minded if you only accept results that fit to your hard- and software-"advices".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.