Author: stuart taylor
Date: 08:23:22 01/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2000 at 10:14:55, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >Let's say somebody comes in here and makes 8,000 posts (in one sitting) >consisting of Nazi propoganda and advertisements for X-rated sites. Also, just >for good measure, this hypothetical person might reply to every thread, saying >it's the stupidest thing ever and that the poster is an idiot (or worse). > >Instead of immediately banning this person, who obviously has no value to CCC >and probably very little value in the real world, you would prefer some long and >drawn out voting procedure? > >You have to have some faith in the moderators that you elect. Some faith that >they won't run around deleting posts they simply don't like and banning people >for political reasons... > >-Tom To Tom, Do you think my posting Re "Banning like death penalty" is the right way? According to those guidlines, the above case would certainly be taken through that proceedure for a combination of-insulting, vulgarity (or promoting it), and extremely off topic. Maybe, if you mean that I'm wrong about vulgarity, It is the very least-the first and the third. It should also be clear that the moderators are not at all interested in whether or not they're outsmarted. O.K. maybe you can't delete someone because of his love of Nazi'ism, but you don't need to let him get away with other things at the same time-just because he is a nazi. I mean he isn't BETTER than someone else.(Although I would still say that a person who keeps speaking about his religion[in a non offensive way] should be treated with more care atleast 5% more care than with a nazi.) Regards! Stuart Taylor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.