Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: They say, "Beauty is skin deep", I say, "Nay, not when it comes to..."

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:12:17 01/25/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 25, 2000 at 13:40:03, Laurence Chen wrote:

>They say, "Beauty is skin deep", I say, "Nay, not when it comes to have to stare
>at it all day or all night".  I'd really like to know how many of you have a
>monitor less than 17 inch in size.  Really, after using a 17 inch monitor or
>large it gets really difficult to go back and use a 14 inch monitor.  So what's
>the point of this post, you probably wondering. GUI in chess interface.
>To a lot of hardcore chess computer users, they would say that engine strength
>is everything, and they probably would not care if the GUI was ugly. But, I
>care.  How many of us would choose a very beautiful woman and not very smart
>over an average looking woman who happens to be very smart?  Seriously, I would
>prefer to have both. Some of you may think that I am spoiled after using
>Chessbase and its GUI is in my opinion very high quality.  Okay, you may say
>that it sucks in 3D, I say so what, no matter what you do, I don't think one can
>create high quality 3D pieces images without sacrificing CPU power and RAM in a
>computer.  Besides if I need to stare at a 3D board, I would prefer to set up my
>chessboard and use my wood chess pieces.  Nothing can beat that.
>The point is that Chessbase has set up a standard for GUI and chess engine
>strength.  And a lot of chess users will always compare it to Chessbase. That's
>the way it goes in business nowadays, it's like Intel setup the standard for
>CPU's.  Let me ask how many of you would by an AMD K-1 chip over the Intel
>Pentium 1 chip?  If such standard did not exist, there would be a lot of chaos.
>For example if IEEE did not exist, we would have problems playing our audio and
>video devices, because different manufactures would set whatever standard they
>like. And that's not acceptable, so why should it be different for chess GUI.  I
>stare at the computer day and night, and for me if the GUI is very ugly or
>unacceptable, the probability of me using the chess program decreases. Thus,
>beauty does matter.
>I hope that Ed Shrodder will take this in consideration when he introduces the
>new Rebel Century for Windows, and that new improvements in the GUI will be made
>by Chesspatner.  Even if it means revising and designing a total new interface.
>I have no complaints with the Rebel-Tiger engine, but when it comes to not
>working properly in a GUI, that makes me roar like a tiger... GRRRRR!!!
>Laurence


I use several.  My office monitor is a 21" Sony that I would not buy if I had
to pay for it myself...  probably way over-priced, but packaged with large
systems like my quad-xeon.

On the other end, I use my sony notebook with a 12.1" XGA LCD panel and like
it a lot.  I also have a gateway notebook with a 14.1" XGA, which is nearly as
big as a 17" monitor.  It is better than my Sony, but weighs over three times
as much.

I find I use my Sony all the time when I am not in my office and don't mind
the 12.1" display..  I just pick the right fonts/window sizes and plod ahead.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.