Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 11:28:27 01/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2000 at 14:12:17, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 25, 2000 at 13:40:03, Laurence Chen wrote: > >>They say, "Beauty is skin deep", And that the deepest thing in a man is his skin (Nietzsche). > I say, "Nay, not when it comes to have to stare >>at it all day or all night". I'd really like to know how many of you have a >>monitor less than 17 inch in size. Really, after using a 17 inch monitor or >>large it gets really difficult to go back and use a 14 inch monitor. So what's >>the point of this post, you probably wondering. GUI in chess interface. >>To a lot of hardcore chess computer users, they would say that engine strength >>is everything, and they probably would not care if the GUI was ugly. But, I >>care. How many of us would choose a very beautiful woman and not very smart >>over an average looking woman who happens to be very smart? Seriously, I would >>prefer to have both. Some of you may think that I am spoiled after using >>Chessbase and its GUI is in my opinion very high quality. Okay, you may say >>that it sucks in 3D, I say so what, no matter what you do, I don't think one can >>create high quality 3D pieces images without sacrificing CPU power and RAM in a >>computer. Besides if I need to stare at a 3D board, I would prefer to set up my >>chessboard and use my wood chess pieces. Nothing can beat that. >>The point is that Chessbase has set up a standard for GUI and chess engine >>strength. And a lot of chess users will always compare it to Chessbase. That's >>the way it goes in business nowadays, it's like Intel setup the standard for >>CPU's. Let me ask how many of you would by an AMD K-1 chip over the Intel >>Pentium 1 chip? If such standard did not exist, there would be a lot of chaos. >>For example if IEEE did not exist, we would have problems playing our audio and >>video devices, because different manufactures would set whatever standard they >>like. And that's not acceptable, so why should it be different for chess GUI. I >>stare at the computer day and night, and for me if the GUI is very ugly or >>unacceptable, the probability of me using the chess program decreases. Thus, >>beauty does matter. >>I hope that Ed Shrodder will take this in consideration when he introduces the >>new Rebel Century for Windows, and that new improvements in the GUI will be made >>by Chesspatner. Even if it means revising and designing a total new interface. >>I have no complaints with the Rebel-Tiger engine, but when it comes to not >>working properly in a GUI, that makes me roar like a tiger... GRRRRR!!! >>Laurence > > >I use several. My office monitor is a 21" Sony that I would not buy if I had >to pay for it myself... probably way over-priced, but packaged with large >systems like my quad-xeon. > >On the other end, I use my sony notebook with a 12.1" XGA LCD panel and like >it a lot. I also have a gateway notebook with a 14.1" XGA, which is nearly as >big as a 17" monitor. It is better than my Sony, but weighs over three times >as much. > >I find I use my Sony all the time when I am not in my office and don't mind >the 12.1" display.. I just pick the right fonts/window sizes and plod ahead. I always use my portable HP with a 12.1'' TFT and I like it much better than any monitors, at least if I must look at the screen for considerable periods of time. Next step is getting a 15'' TFT. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.