Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Back ontopic

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 13:27:11 01/25/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 25, 2000 at 01:06:05, Harald Faber wrote:
>Because you don't understand. Even Christophe explained that to you.

even christophe is mistaken too.

ok - i do explain it to you.

you can stretch a feather, and it will react dynamically.
but than, suddenly, you come to a point of no return.
and than the feather breakes and the reaction is massive.

or: you can drive on a motorway to the left, to the right, to the left,
from one side to another. now speed up. it will still work,
but be more difficult. suddenly, you come to the point of no return,
and the car drives out of the path, the dynamically movement
stops and develops into a chaotic movement.
you get a car crash.

now take 2 chessplayers. they are arround 50 elo different.
the machines are similar. you get reasonable results. like the
car driving left and right. or the feather.

now take 2 chessprograms. they are arround 100 elo different.
lets call them junior-shredder2.
they are running both on 450 mhz.

junior kills shredder. but the car is still on track. it will not
crash. its within the range that produce sensible data.

now take shredder2 from the 450 mhz and put it on
the 200 mhz.
now junior6 450Mhz fights vs. shredder2 200 Mhz.

and suddenly. you come to a point where your results do not anymore
only show effects of the programs, as the car crash is not only
a reason of the car, or the feather, but of the overstressed
material breaking.

suddenly the results become worthless.
like letting kasparov playing a 1500 ELO guy.
of course the 20 games match between kasparov produces measurable
data, as much as the car-crash produces measurable data.
but what both things connects is:

2800 ELO vs. 1500 ELO produces not very sensible data.
the data you get crashing on the motorway does not tell us much
how good the car drives. it only shows that you overstressed the physics
involved.

junio6 - shredder 2 is withtin the sensible range.

if both run on 450 Mhz or on 200 mhz.
but junior6 on 450 vs. shredder2 on 200 produces results,
no doubt about you get data, but the data is as senseless
as the data the broken feather produces, or your car, when it crashes.
or when kasparov plays you. you get elo-points. but they do not
really be relevant.


>Are you allowed to criticize the SSDF methods of testing?

of course i am !

Geben Sie Gedankenfreiheit Sir !!


> Maybe, but you are
>blind and one-track minded if you only accept results that fit to your hard- and
>software-"advices".

pah - i give it up harald.

the programmers tune and tune on state of the art hardware ,
and you let them run on old machines that get search depths neither
the programmer nor the testers have ever seen their programs  fight against
each other.

do it.

crash with your car, do it.

its a free world.
if you want another world, build it.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.