Author: Chessfun
Date: 19:27:39 01/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2000 at 07:55:48, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On January 25, 2000 at 00:59:39, Tina Long wrote: > >>On January 24, 2000 at 14:52:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On January 24, 2000 at 14:19:53, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>Thorsten, an elo calculation can be done for a new program only if its opponents >>>>have a known, well established elo (with many games, and a small error margin). >>> >>>correct. >>> >>>>This is why it is better to play against older program than against new programs >>>>on 450, because the new programs have a too big error margin. >>> >>>no problem with me. the problem i have is with very old prgs. >>> >>>>It's maybe the 3rd or 4th time I repeat this to you. The SSDF results are VALID. >>> >>>its valid but senseless. >><snip> >> >>To decide who is rightest here I need to know: >>What is the expected result in an 18 game match between two human players who >>are rated 2620 & 2505? > >12-6 > >>What is the rating achieved by both players if the result is 14.5 - 3.5? > >It indicates a ratingdifference with 238 points, 2681-2443. > >>I will make my own opinion if I think the margin of error is too great. >>(My interest here is also STILL in CM6k & it's flogging of Sparc 20mhz, and >>programs on 486/66's) >> >>Thanks to anyone who can answer those two questions. >> >>Tina Long > >Tony Over only 18 games how can anyone judge. What is the current score with these two programs?. from what I read a lot closer than the original 14.5 - 3.5. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.