Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: DB NPS (anyone know the position used)?

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 00:07:42 01/26/00

Go up one level in this thread

On January 25, 2000 at 23:57:33, Ernst A. Heinz wrote:

>> In a one by one setting it does not matter at all.
>Still not convinced: a quiescence node that produces a direct
>"stand pat" cutoff obviously generates less work than one
>which fails to do so -- even in hardware!  *** QED ***
>Or am I missing something?

Something else... I always wondered about this free 4-ply evaluation. I
can understand that evaluation for the current position done in hardware
is possible in a few cycles. I can't understand this also to be true for
4 plies as it should involve: search, hash table, q-search etc. In other
words a complete chess program.


This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.