Author: jonathon smith
Date: 06:49:09 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 09:02:17, KarinsDad wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 08:32:24, Albert Silver wrote: > >[snip] >>> >>>Bella is banned. There is a lot of evidence that Bella is Chris, hence, Dann >>>thinks that Chris is banned. Chris' account is not banned. >> >>Perhaps not anymore, but it certainly was. According to Bruce, the password for >>Chris's account was changed and that's banning plain and simple. If you live >>with someone, and that person changes the lock and doesn't give you the key, >>that means you are no longer welcome. >> >> Albert Silver > >Good point, but all of the information is not out. Chris was banned and then >unbanned (and then later, his alias' were banned). So, the lock was changed, but >changed back. > >KarinsDad :) Fascinating. ChrisW says he knows this much: 1. He did not post since November 1997. 2. In March 1998, he received notification of a ban in two ways. (a) From Enrique Irazoqui by email, using the word 'ban' that Hyatt now denies. (b) From Schroeder and co. by rgcc public post with the phrase "no longer welcome on CCC". 3. To confirm the ban, ChrisW said he logged in twice that day to CCC using his original username and password combination. He said the server came up with an invalid password/username message. 4. At the end of the Moreland, Amir Ban, Don Dailey period; ChrisW told me he was in email contact with the latter two moderators (Bruce Moreland having resigned already). The two moderators told ChrisW he could reapply for membership if he wanted. ChrisW said he told them that the minimum he would accept would be a reinstallation of the original password and username, since, in his (ChrisW's) view this password/username combination was 'illegally' deleted. Illegally meaning outside of the Charter of the CCC. Also they would have to remind him what the username/password actually was, since he had forgotten by then. Ban and Dailey refused to reinstate the original password/username, they said ChrisW should go through normal application procedures open to any person. Now you appear to be stating that the original password/username was reinstated at a later date, but without informing anybody. Specifically without informing ChrisW, and in the knowledge that ChrisW didn't know the password/username details anyway. Why and when were the password/username combination restored? Why was ChrisW not informed? Was Bruce Moreland informed? He appears to consider that ChrisW is banned by the method of password change.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.