Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:07:30 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 09:49:09, jonathon smith wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 09:02:17, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On January 26, 2000 at 08:32:24, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>[snip] >>>> >>>>Bella is banned. There is a lot of evidence that Bella is Chris, hence, Dann >>>>thinks that Chris is banned. Chris' account is not banned. >>> >>>Perhaps not anymore, but it certainly was. According to Bruce, the password for >>>Chris's account was changed and that's banning plain and simple. If you live >>>with someone, and that person changes the lock and doesn't give you the key, >>>that means you are no longer welcome. >>> >>> Albert Silver >> >>Good point, but all of the information is not out. Chris was banned and then >>unbanned (and then later, his alias' were banned). So, the lock was changed, but >>changed back. >> >>KarinsDad :) > >Fascinating. > >ChrisW says he knows this much: > >1. He did not post since November 1997. > >2. In March 1998, he received notification of a ban in two ways. > >(a) From Enrique Irazoqui by email, using the word 'ban' that Hyatt now denies. >(b) From Schroeder and co. by rgcc public post with the phrase "no longer >welcome on CCC". > >3. To confirm the ban, ChrisW said he logged in twice that day to CCC using his >original username and password combination. He said the server came up with an >invalid password/username message. > >4. At the end of the Moreland, Amir Ban, Don Dailey period; ChrisW told me he >was in email contact with the latter two moderators (Bruce Moreland having >resigned already). The two moderators told ChrisW he could reapply for >membership if he wanted. ChrisW said he told them that the minimum he would >accept would be a reinstallation of the original password and username, since, >in his (ChrisW's) view this password/username combination was 'illegally' >deleted. Illegally meaning outside of the Charter of the CCC. Tell your alter ego that he demanded the deletion of his password/username. We kindly obliged. Enrique > Also they would >have to remind him what the username/password actually was, since he had >forgotten by then. Ban and Dailey refused to reinstate the original >password/username, they said ChrisW should go through normal application >procedures open to any person. > >Now you appear to be stating that the original password/username was reinstated >at a later date, but without informing anybody. Specifically without informing >ChrisW, and in the knowledge that ChrisW didn't know the password/username >details anyway. > >Why and when were the password/username combination restored? Why was ChrisW not >informed? > >Was Bruce Moreland informed? He appears to consider that ChrisW is banned by the >method of password change.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.