Author: Tijs van Dam
Date: 08:08:50 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 10:59:13, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>On January 26, 2000 at 08:08:01, Tijs van Dam wrote:
>
>
>> tree->next_status[ply].phase=FIRST_PHASE;
>> if (tree->hash_move[ply]==0 && do_null && depth>=3*INCPLY) do {
>> ....
>> } while(0);
>
>The "do { ... } while (0)"
>above looks peculiar to me. Another copy mistake ?
No, Dr. Hyatt uses this construction a lot. You can break anywhere inside the do
and continue with what's beyond it. Like "return;" in the middle of a function.
IMHO, i think it's ugly. And my compiler broke on it in Crafty's evaluation
function.
>
>Uli
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.