Author: jonathon smith
Date: 08:27:58 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 11:17:55, KarinsDad wrote: >I cannot answer your questions with details. > >All I can tell you is that Tim said the account was banned (i.e. password >changed), then unbanned, then later deleted for inactivity. This string of happenstances must have been just technical. If the account was 'unbanned' as part of a 'moderation' decision, then the account holder would surely have been told. ChrisW told me that he received no message to this effect. > >As for the rest, I do not know the details. > >It should be water under the bridge for everyone by now, including Chris, but >some people (and I am not just referring to Chris here) have a hard time letting >go of old problems. I wish they would. ChrisW says it is not a question of letting go of old problems. A ban is a serious event in a small community with few outlets for expression. Lieing about it afterwards is more serious. The ban and the lies still continue. ChrisW says he fails utterly to understand Enrique Irazoqui's logic that "ChrisW was not banned", when Enrique Irazoqui sent ChrisW the email telling him that he was. And in which the word 'ban' was specifically set out. ChrisW says he can only surmise about this man's motivations. > >KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.