Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:04:46 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 10:36:24, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >This is all very good, but besides the point. I am not questioning Shredder 4, >Junior 4.6 or Fritz 3, all World Champions, but the way to grant such a title. the way was always a sports-event. like human chess championships. when i remember the championships i see that there was always luck, but also very often the strongest programs winning the title or sharing it. remember ChessMachine with ed's madrid-version winning. remember stefan in jakarta. remember stefan in paderborn :-))) whatever you remember anyway :-)) remember 1993 hiarcs in munich ... ... the programs won, and they were , as far as i know, really stronger. so what ?? its the same in tennis, in motorsports and in human-chess. you have the championships and you have the rating-lists. i don't see any problem. >>is there any reason to change the point of view about the strength of >>shredder/tiger ?? > >Shhhhhh... (CIA classified information...) brilliant way of answering. >Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.