Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 12:11:30 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 12:14:41, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 11:20:38, Charles Unruh wrote: > >> In the past there was a person here named I think Shaun Graham. Hyatt was >>constantly attacking him. Graham finally was fed up and in post said he would >>stay out of Hyatt's posts if Hyatt stayed out of his. Hyatt in a post said >>that he agreed and would stay out. A little while later Hyatt started >>posting(attacking IMHO) in Graham's posts again Graham basically blew up and >>told him to stop, and called Hyatt a liar. Hyatt basically agreed that he lied >>and scoffed. Graham enfuriated started a thread urging protection from the >>moderators to protect him because he felt since Hyatt was violating an agreement >>made in writing here that Hyatt's action was therefore uncalled for Antagonism >>and should be stopped. Then the moderators banned Graham for asking for help(I >>was there and saw it!). Of course there are some new moderators now, but they >>seem to be quite similar except for Amir Ban who was in that old group of >>moderators. Who now after having to deal with the bloodletting attacks of Hyatt >>himself may have at least a different attitude when it comes to THE HYATT. > >Moderators will moderate according to the charter, not according to agreements >made between specific members. If you believe that you made a binding agreement >with Dr. Hyatt, and that he broke it, feel free to take it up with him, via >email, or adopt some other remedy outside CCC. > >I was a moderator at the time that complaint was made, and you First of all i made no such thing because i'm not the one who had the complaint with Hyatt at the time. That little episode was just one in a myriad of episodes i have witnessed occuring between Hyatt and Dozens of other posters but anyway i don't care too much as long as Hyatt doesn't attack me. complained that >Hyatt should be banned over a completely on-topic non-abusive post. He simply >responded to something you said. You wrote an extremely abusive post in >response. You then ignored the warning you received, did something further, and >were tossed out. > >It was a bizarre situation. > >Thanks, > >bruce > >> >>>I will no longer respond to any post >>>or attachment to one of my posts by >>>Dr. Hyatt. My silence should not >>>be interpreted as agreement, or disagreement, just >>>anoyment. >>> >>>I find his personal attacks "tastless". >>> >>>I respect Dr. Hyatt's work, his work on >>>Crafty is a great service to many, his >>>work on Cray Blitz was a huge accomplishment, >>>his insights on computer chess programming are >>>greatly appreciated, however, I do not >>>wish to waste my time responding to >>>his "tasteless" posts that do not add >>>anything to some discussions (IMHO). >>> >>>I hope the moderators will communicate with >>>Dr. Hyatt. He is entitled to his >>>opinion, but so am I and so are the >>>rest of the people in this group. >>> >>>I have asked Dr. Hyatt not to respond to >>>my posts unless I ask explicetly for his >>>opinion or unless he has the data I >>>requested. I will do the same. >>> >>>If I am out of line, then the moderators >>>can communicate with me. Noone get's >>>a free ticket (IMHO). >>> >>>My personal e-mail address has changed, if >>>you want it, ask in a post and I will send >>>it directly to you. >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.