Author: jonathon smith
Date: 07:46:35 01/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2000 at 07:39:52, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >_________________________________________________________ >Posted by Robert Hyatt on January 25, 2000 at 14:23:10: > >This was no cover story. You (excuse me, I meant Chris) specifically said >"please delete my CCC handle as I won't be back." We debated this for a good >while, taking no action. Later we finally asked for this to be done. We didn't >have a 'ban' policy in effect with Steve, so he simply changed the password, >which effectively did what you (I mean Chris) asked. Of course, it did mean >that you (I mean Chris) could never use this handle again. We were not aware >of this until Bruce researched it last year. Of course you (I mean Chris) can >(and does) come back under a different handle. I have no problem with deleting >the old ID and letting the 'group' rejoin under one handle. Never did. > Hyatt: "[Chris] can ... come back under a different handle .... I have no problem .... never did." Public humiliation document on day of banning dated 17 March 1998: ".....Chris Whittington ..... not welcome there [CCC]" signed by Bob Hyatt" Would Bob Hyatt please explain how he simultaneously "never had a problem with Chris coming back" and the signed statement "Chris not welcome at CCC". Typically the Kafka victim: (a) has no idea of what he is supposed to have done wrong. (b) has no idea as to any release date (if ever). (c) never receives a straight answer to a question. (d) always receives different answers, depending. (e) doesn't have anybody to ask anyway. (f) never gets to meet the real accuser. (g) is cast into endless punishment for reasons nobody understands. (h) is a special case for which no procedures exist. Therefore nothing can be done. etc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.