Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:51:01 01/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 18:28:22, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On January 26, 2000 at 18:23:50, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On January 26, 2000 at 18:10:10, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>IOW, more horsepower is a tough way to make chess programs play better. There
>>>is also evidence (according to some) that the increase in speed has
>>>*diminishing* returns. Hence, it may take a terahertz to get there. Don't know
>>>of any material that could do that, not even a Josephson Junction.
>>
>>I think it's a great way. You just take a vacation, preferably a long one, and
>>when you come back you make one call to Gateway and poof, free Elo points.
>>
>>Got an article that shows that the Elo curve flattens out with increased depth?
>
>Darn. I knew someone would ask that! I just read it somewhere, but I will have
>to go and look for it now.
>:-(
Just my 2 cents: this "dimishing returns" theory is an urban legend.
You are almost certain to have seen this demonstrated, you'll find people that
will tell you they have seen this demonstrated, but you'll eventually find no
proof of this.
But everybody wants to believe it because it fits so well our common sense. When
everybody in a group believes in something, it eventually because "real" for
this group.
Computer chess is CROWDED with legends like this one.
The programmers that do better than their peers are those who do not believe
these legends.
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.