Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 19:49:11 01/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2000 at 22:43:22, Chris Carson wrote: >On January 27, 2000 at 22:17:25, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Have you done a correlational coefficient? >> >>It might also be interesting to calculate prediction and confidence intervals. > >Yes: > >Regression >Analysis >R = 1.00 Correlation Coef. >SEM = 18.1 Error of measure (2 SEM = 95% confidence) >Slope = 231.4 (number of SSDF points per 6x speedup, or per ply) > (this means 77 points for 2x speed increase) > (this would be for both hw and programming improvements) >Y intercept = 272.8 > >Note: The regression analysis changes slightly as the SSDF continues >testing (new lists), but not a whole lot (maybe 10% over time). I doubt the figures. A 1.00 correlation coefficient is a perfect correlation. Something *must* be amiss. No measured data ever correlates perfectly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.