Author: Peter Stahlhacke
Date: 05:25:09 01/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2000 at 07:27:54, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >There is a degree of uncertainty, but I don't think you need 1000 matches of 200 >games each to have an idea of who is best. > Christophe did not(and also not his qbasic Prg) say that 1000 matches of 200 games each are needed to have an idea of who is best or st. similar like that. The 1000 matches (better are 1Mio) are needed to exactly determine the 93.5 %
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.