Author: blass uri
Date: 23:17:12 01/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2000 at 01:47:43, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On January 28, 2000 at 10:54:08, blass uri wrote: > >>Rebel Century got a clear advantage from the opening and could win a pawn but it >>prefered to get a positional advantage by 16.Re2(I do not think that the >>decision was right). >> >>The GM offered a draw at move 30 and I declined the offer. >>Vitali Golud claimed after the game that Rebel did not see simple tactics. >>I replied that it prefered a positional advantage. > >Do you think that he tried to trick Rebel into taking the material and getting a >positional advantage for himself? > >Dave No He could not get positional advantage by sacrificing the material. Rebel evaluated taking the pawn as more than 1 pawn advantage but not taking the pawn was evaluated as a bigger positional advantage. I thought that taking the pawn was better and he told me that he also thought the same. Sometimes humans are more materialistic than some programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.