Author: blass uri
Date: 23:24:33 01/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2000 at 18:03:24, Roger wrote: >On January 28, 2000 at 10:54:08, blass uri wrote: > >>Rebel came late to the game because of the people who are responsible for the >>hardware. >> >>I also had to install Rebel again because there was a problem with the hardware >>and the result was that Rebel started the game with disadvantage of almost 40 >>minutes. >> >> >>I understood from the question of golud in the begining of the game >>that he was not prepared to play Rebel. >> >>He asked if he plays against Rebel10 and >>I told him that he plays against a newer version of Rebel. >> >>I expected to play against someone who bought the opponent. >> >>Rebel Century got a clear advantage from the opening and could win a pawn but it >>prefered to get a positional advantage by 16.Re2(I do not think that the >>decision was right). >> >>The GM offered a draw at move 30 and I declined the offer. >>Vitali Golud claimed after the game that Rebel did not see simple tactics. > > > >Strange that the GM would ever allow such "simple tactics." If the GM had forty >more missed on the clock and he allowed them, what does that say about the GM? The GM did not have a better choice one move before the simple tactics because his position was bad. I also do not think that the tactics is so simple for humans. I think that I would be afraid of playing Nxc5 at tournament time control because of g5 (white can win after g5 by Rxe7 but I am not good enough to see it and my israeli rating is 2025) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.