Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 08:18:52 01/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2000 at 02:17:12, blass uri wrote: >On January 29, 2000 at 01:47:43, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On January 28, 2000 at 10:54:08, blass uri wrote: >> >>>Rebel Century got a clear advantage from the opening and could win a pawn but it >>>prefered to get a positional advantage by 16.Re2(I do not think that the >>>decision was right). >>> >>>The GM offered a draw at move 30 and I declined the offer. >>>Vitali Golud claimed after the game that Rebel did not see simple tactics. >>>I replied that it prefered a positional advantage. >> >>Do you think that he tried to trick Rebel into taking the material and getting a >>positional advantage for himself? >> >>Dave > >No > >He could not get positional advantage by sacrificing the material. >Rebel evaluated taking the pawn as more than 1 pawn advantage but not taking the >pawn was evaluated as a bigger positional advantage. > >I thought that taking the pawn was better and he told me that he also thought >the same. > >Sometimes humans are more materialistic than some programs. Very funny. This is the world up-side-down. Years we are told our programs are way too materialistic, and now this.... Ed >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.