Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 18:28:51 01/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2000 at 18:11:43, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>On January 30, 2000 at 18:02:38, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On January 30, 2000 at 17:42:49, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>On January 30, 2000 at 16:52:03, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 30, 2000 at 15:42:12, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On January 30, 2000 at 15:10:53, curtiss wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Its been offical there will be a fritz 6.32 in late march its elo has been
>>>>>>guessed at 2765
>>>>>
>>>>>It is official that at the same time Rebel-Tiger will be at elo 2800. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Christophe
>>>>
>>>> Isn't this a slightly humorous statement? I don't mean not true. I just
>>>>mean it's a very funny way to say it. A nice duet with the above mentioned.
>>>> But seriously, is it possible to know what's being planned for Rebel
>>>>Tiger? Also for fritz-if there is. I don't quite see the new idea in 6.32.
>>>> Regards!
>>>> Stuart Taylor.
>>>
>>>Come on, this Curtiss guy is only spamming. There is no 6.32. Fritz 6 is already
>>>32 bit.
>>>
>>>Enrique
>>
>>
>>That's what I think too. Of course it was humour on my side (which was clearly
>>stated by the smiley).
>
>Sure, that's how I read it. I also posted some nonsense about all new programs
>being 10000 Elo and didn't even bother putting a smiley. About this guy, I think
>we should open some sort of CCC kindergarden. You'll take care of it. :)
>
>Enrique
>
>PS. Back to serious (?) stuff (and please change the title of the thread if you
>reply): I started the match Tiger-Junior. What happens if Tiger starts playing
>time and again a losing line? I don't have it clear. On one hand, it would
>distort the games as a way to find out about engines; on the other, if it
>happens, it happens and only the maker of the learner is to be blamed, isn't it?
>:(
>
>> Christophe
Yes, if a program loses repeatedly to the same opening, it is the programmer's
fault. It's my fault.
We are going to publish a small patch which fixes this problem.
However, if you use the new parameters NSEW=1 and MoreSel=1, the games should
already by different from what has been played on the SSDF. Not even taking into
account the fact that Rebel-Tiger is faster than Tiger DOS and that it can use
bigger hash tables.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.