Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ICC tourney standings after round 4

Author: Amir Ban

Date: 03:59:36 01/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 31, 2000 at 05:14:59, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote:

>On January 31, 2000 at 03:42:35, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>On January 30, 2000 at 22:51:08, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On January 30, 2000 at 19:24:00, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>>
>>>>Place  Program          Score  SOP
>>>>    1  Crafty           4.0    8.0
>>>>    2  Junior           3.0    9.0
>>>>       Diep             3.0    9.0
>>>>    4  Shredder         3.0    8.0
>>>>    5  Insomniac        3.0    5.5
>>>>    6  Nimzo            2.5    11.5
>>>>    7  Little_Goliath   2.5    9.5
>>>>    8  Galahad          2.5    6.5
>>>>       Lambchop         2.5    6.5
>>>>   10  Ferret           2.0    10.5
>>>>   11  Postmodernist    2.0    9.5
>>>>   12  Hossa            2.0    7.0
>>>>   13  Bringer          1.5    9.5
>>>>       Amateur          1.5    9.5
>>>>   15  Shrike           1.5    9.0
>>>>   16  Gnuchess         1.5    8.5
>>>>   17  Grok             1.5    7.5
>>>>   18  EXchess          1.5    7.0
>>>>   19  Tinker           1.0    7.0
>>>>   20  Storm            1.0    5.5
>>>>   21  Averno           0.5    6.5
>>>>   22  TSCP             0.5    5.5
>>>
>>>
>>>Hello,
>>>I am enjoying this tournament.  I would like to see a list of programs including
>>>the hardware they are using.  Can someone point me in the right direction?
>>>Also, I think it should be mentioned that it is Shredder 3 and not Shredder 4
>>>that is playing.
>>>Jim Walker
>>
>>I disagree. If Stefan wants Shredder 4 to play he can arrange it in a second.
>>Everybody bring their best software and best hardware, and programs should be
>>called by their generic name.
>>
>>Amir
>
>Shredder3 is the best program I have that is automatic on ICC. That's why S3 is
>playing and not S4, so I'd rather call it Shredder3.
>
>Right now I don't have time to add and test the automatic interface in S4,
>otherwise I would have done it.
>
>Stefan

If so you should play manually because the overhead is of no consequence in this
time control.

Amir




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.