Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:19:50 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2000 at 09:02:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 31, 2000 at 05:06:38, Harald Faber wrote: > >> >>Does any programmer use fuzzy programming within his program? >>If not, would it be helpful and make it easier or better to evaluate positions? >>AFAIK fuzzy is an ideal tool for combining several different, even complementary >>evaluation parameters, and chess programming has a large number of evaluation >>functions... >> >>Opinions? > > >I would suspect that _all_ chess programs have some 'fuzzy logic' in them. >one example is recognizing the stonewall pattern. If you require the exact >pawn structure, you get zapped if he forgets to push the c2 pawn to c3 for >example. If you 'fuzzy match' one pawn missing doesn't invalidate the >pattern. I see clear difference between using some form of fuzzy logic, cq see current chessprograms as a form of fuzzy logic, and making usage of 100% fuzzy programming. The methods as decribed in fuzzy logic programming are to say with an understatement 'naive', or even better 'quickly done to produce a paper'. Vincent >I certainly do it...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.