Author: Masciulli Gianluigi
Date: 09:01:52 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2000 at 07:47:06, Jari Huikari wrote: >On January 31, 2000 at 03:52:51, Masciulli Gianluigi wrote: > >>I just implemented the quescience seach but in a "exploding way" >> >>I'm searching all the move that eat someting to quiesce the position but most of >>case golem start eating and enver stop (may be after 20/30 play but im no able >>to follow it) >> >>Any Idea to prune it? (any help is welcome :-) > >I'm not quite sure what you meant. Do you mean that you search everything >to certain depth, and deeper than that depth you only search captures? >Do you search as long as captures can be found? Perhaps you could have >some maximum depth for them. (E.g. Search all moves to depth N and captures >to depth 2*N.) Or if either side has lost much more valuable pieces, cut >the search earlier in such case. hum... this one seems smart :-) > >I'm not sure, if I understood anything at all, but you said _any_ help >is welcome. :-) > > Jari Jari, I think you understood all. Yes i serch all move until a certain depth(with alfa-beta cutting) and then I go on searching only capture, just like you said. As you said i set a maximum depth (You guessed it! :-) The main thing is that Everyting slowed sown so much that the golem before the quiesce play better than the new one :-( All this happened this night .. very late so may be there is some gross mistake i did that wait to be found. I'd like to know how you do that just to know is I'm in the right path. ciao
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.