Author: Harald Faber
Date: 13:39:20 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2000 at 09:55:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>I am not sure. My company does ordering of 2^700 possibilities and photo/image >>(tyres) recognition which also works by comparing patterns and so on. That works >>fine so far, so why shouldn't it be possible to use at least some of these >>techniques? It seems to me that you should talk to someone more intensively who >>has a much knowlegde of fuzzy programming and fuzzy programming techniques. >> >The problem however in chess is that you need metaknowledge about a position >which decides what you think from an UNKNOWN position. >Basically you try to get an evaluation from something unknown, >and here lies the problem: > >In chess you train for the unknown (positions), >but in tyresrecognition you know EXACTLY for what tyre you are >looking for, so it has a CLEAR and VERY EXACT goal. > >Vincent But not for ordering exercises. My boss said there are also very often unclear goals. Probably I should give him your e-mail adress, he is definitely the better man for talking about fuzzy techniques.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.