Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 16:37:47 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2000 at 16:39:20, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 31, 2000 at 09:55:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >> >>>I am not sure. My company does ordering of 2^700 possibilities and photo/image >>>(tyres) recognition which also works by comparing patterns and so on. That works >>>fine so far, so why shouldn't it be possible to use at least some of these >>>techniques? It seems to me that you should talk to someone more intensively who >>>has a much knowlegde of fuzzy programming and fuzzy programming techniques. >>> >>The problem however in chess is that you need metaknowledge about a position >>which decides what you think from an UNKNOWN position. >>Basically you try to get an evaluation from something unknown, >>and here lies the problem: >> >>In chess you train for the unknown (positions), >>but in tyresrecognition you know EXACTLY for what tyre you are >>looking for, so it has a CLEAR and VERY EXACT goal. >> >>Vincent > >But not for ordering exercises. My boss said there are also very often unclear >goals. Probably I should give him your e-mail adress, he is definitely the >better man for talking about fuzzy techniques. Your boss doesn't understand chess. Let him produce a fuzzy logic chessprogram , no matter how crappy it is. we can read source better than some vague words.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.