Author: Will Singleton
Date: 16:58:27 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2000 at 15:25:48, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 31, 2000 at 15:13:37, Will Singleton wrote: >[snip] >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Active Accounts -- Standard >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>ACCOUNT STANDARD R(mhz) | WIN% GP/WK TGP | HIGH LOW ACTIVE >> >>PostModernist 2452 2482 | 59% 70 147 | 2474 2442 14 >>Beadle 2405 2475 | 64% 61 128 | 2418 2378 14 >I am very impressed by these two showings. Higher than some commerical programs >on heavy-duty hardware. Also a fairly large number of games have been played, >indicating that it is rather unlikely to be a fluke of some kind. > >I would like to see the formula for opponents for these machines if possible. Yes, I'm impressed too. And I just got beat by the souped up Lambchop, and get PM next. Not sure what you mean by formula for opponents. You mean the icc formulas? > >>JudgeTurpin 2401 2471 | 43% 18 39 | 2404 2391 14 >>Talmoves 2427 2427 | 55% 4 9 | 2443 2425 14 >>Galahadx 2381 2422 | 50% 0 2 | 2381 2296 0 >>MissSilicon 2386 2416 | 50% 1 4 | 2397 2386 14 >>gambitmaster 2382 2401 | 20% 4 10 | 2382 2356 0 >>RedBear 2334 2375 | 42% 10 21 | 2364 2334 14 >>GnuChess 2347 2366 | 83% 17 36 | 2377 2298 14 >>GKJunior 2311 2366 | 73% 27 57 | 2311 2177 14 >>Amateur 2305 2324 | 57% 54 114 | 2432 2243 14 >Amateur really took it on the chin as far as ranking in this list. Do you know >what happened? Was it some kind of trojan horse attack, or was it competition >from a new source that had Ameteur's number or ??? Two things: I was testing new books and time-control code, and then some guy beat me a lot. He might have been using a comp. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.