Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ICC Green List - Jan 31

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 17:04:17 01/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 31, 2000 at 19:58:27, Will Singleton wrote:

>On January 31, 2000 at 15:25:48, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On January 31, 2000 at 15:13:37, Will Singleton wrote:
>>[snip]
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>                       Active Accounts -- Standard
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>ACCOUNT     STANDARD  R(mhz) |  WIN%  GP/WK  TGP  |  HIGH    LOW   ACTIVE
>>>
>>>PostModernist   2452    2482 |   59%     70  147  |  2474   2442       14
>>>Beadle          2405    2475 |   64%     61  128  |  2418   2378       14
>
>>I am very impressed by these two showings.  Higher than some commerical programs
>>on heavy-duty hardware.  Also a fairly large number of games have been played,
>>indicating that it is rather unlikely to be a fluke of some kind.
>>
>>I would like to see the formula for opponents for these machines if possible.
>
>Yes, I'm impressed too.  And I just got beat by the souped up Lambchop, and get
>PM next.
>
>Not sure what you mean by formula for opponents.  You mean the icc formulas?
>
>
>>
>>>JudgeTurpin     2401    2471 |   43%     18   39  |  2404   2391       14
>>>Talmoves        2427    2427 |   55%      4    9  |  2443   2425       14
>>>Galahadx        2381    2422 |   50%      0    2  |  2381   2296        0
>>>MissSilicon     2386    2416 |   50%      1    4  |  2397   2386       14
>>>gambitmaster    2382    2401 |   20%      4   10  |  2382   2356        0
>>>RedBear         2334    2375 |   42%     10   21  |  2364   2334       14
>>>GnuChess        2347    2366 |   83%     17   36  |  2377   2298       14
>>>GKJunior        2311    2366 |   73%     27   57  |  2311   2177       14
>>>Amateur         2305    2324 |   57%     54  114  |  2432   2243       14
>
>>Amateur really took it on the chin as far as ranking in this list.  Do you know
>>what happened?  Was it some kind of trojan horse attack, or was it competition
>>from a new source that had Ameteur's number or ???
>
>Two things: I was testing new books and time-control code, and then some guy
>beat me a lot.  He might have been using a comp.

diepx also swallowed 15 points with an adjourned game that's already
out of your history but still in history of diepx.

>Will



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.