Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:40:34 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 08:17:19, pete wrote: >On January 31, 2000 at 21:52:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 31, 2000 at 11:09:54, pete wrote: >> >>><snip> >>> >>>>same thing in round 1, in a gambit by white, crafty (black) was unhappy (-.6 or >>>>so) until it took over the g file... >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>?? wasn't round 1 the game against Bringer ? Seems you are talking about another >>>game . >> >> >>You are correct. Rounds 2 and 3 saw - scores for a good while after >>leaving the book... game 1 was essentially 'equal' according to the >>score, which was .01 for the first search... > >Another thing : what do you/crafty think where Bringer went wrong ? > >Game seems to be drawn up to about move 40 but I found it extremely difficult to >find the turning point ; I got the impression that Bringer was outsearched >somewhere , but where ? Nothing big I can see. At move 19, crafty expected Nxd3, score=.15, Bringer played Rc5, my score improved to +.55 from ply 1 on, so this is positional. Next small jump was at move 25, but it happened on the predicted move. Score went from .52 to almost +1. but bringer played what was expected, so this was just 'lucky' (or wrong). By move 29 score was back to +.5. By move 35, my score was down to -.20 at depth=12. By move 37 it was back to +.36 even though Bringer had made nothing but predicted moves. It dropped to almost even until black played Qb5 at move 38. Score went to +.65 there, which seems to be a positional gain again. On 43 Qe5 score went from +1.0 to +1.3 but the PV doesn't yet show the win of a pawn. The depth here was 15 plies for reference. The score goes steadily up from here, without any 1.0 jumps at all, just slow progress (say +.1 to +.2 every move from this point on).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.