Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 14:13:26 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 17:00:31, Daniel Chancey wrote: >1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 e6 3.c4 d5 4.Bg5 dxc4 5.Nc3 c6 6.e4 b5 7.e5 h6 8.Bh4 g5 9.Nxg5 >hxg5 10.Bxg5 Nbd7 11.exf6 Bb7 12.g3 c5 13.d5 Bh6 14.Bxh6 Rxh6 15.Qd2 Qxf6 >16.O-O-O Bxd5 17.Nxd5 exd5 18.Bg2 Nb6 19.Bxd5 Rc8 20.Bf3 Kf8 21.h4 Na4 22.Bg4 c3 >23.bxc3 Re8 24.Rhe1 Rxe1 25.Rxe1 Nxc3 26.Re3 b4 27.Rf3 Qd6 28.Rd3 Nxa2+ 29.Kc2 >Qf6 30.Qe3 c4 31.Qc5+ Kg7 32.Qxc4 Qxf2+ 33.Kb3 a5 34.Qc7 Rf6 35.h5 Qe1 36.Bd1 >Qe4 37.Qc2 Qxd3+ 38.Qxd3 Nc1+ 0-1 > >Not a good start for a ccc member. Can you analyse this game and see where >white went wrong? > >Castle2000 Yes, because if you do not specify the hardware, time control and other relevant conditions a lot of people will complain/ask. I do not care about those details. José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.