Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 15:30:10 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 17:13:26, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 17:00:31, Daniel Chancey wrote: > >>1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 e6 3.c4 d5 4.Bg5 dxc4 5.Nc3 c6 6.e4 b5 7.e5 h6 8.Bh4 g5 9.Nxg5 >>hxg5 10.Bxg5 Nbd7 11.exf6 Bb7 12.g3 c5 13.d5 Bh6 14.Bxh6 Rxh6 15.Qd2 Qxf6 >>16.O-O-O Bxd5 17.Nxd5 exd5 18.Bg2 Nb6 19.Bxd5 Rc8 20.Bf3 Kf8 21.h4 Na4 22.Bg4 c3 >>23.bxc3 Re8 24.Rhe1 Rxe1 25.Rxe1 Nxc3 26.Re3 b4 27.Rf3 Qd6 28.Rd3 Nxa2+ 29.Kc2 >>Qf6 30.Qe3 c4 31.Qc5+ Kg7 32.Qxc4 Qxf2+ 33.Kb3 a5 34.Qc7 Rf6 35.h5 Qe1 36.Bd1 >>Qe4 37.Qc2 Qxd3+ 38.Qxd3 Nc1+ 0-1 >> >>Not a good start for a ccc member. Can you analyse this game and see where >>white went wrong? >> >>Castle2000 > > Yes, because if you do not specify the hardware, time control and other >relevant conditions a lot of people will complain/ask. > I do not care about those details. >José. Apart from time controls, hardware and settings, who is black, and who is white ????
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.