Author: Chessfun
Date: 17:27:01 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 19:30:29, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 19:19:58, Côme wrote: > >>On February 01, 2000 at 19:09:18, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>Junior 6a won 12-8, +8 -4 =8. Games will be posted at >>>http://www.computerschach.de/tourn/cad00.htm >>> >>>Next match, Century - Hiarcs 7.32. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>Hello Enrique, >>Great Tournament ! >>Few months ago CT destroy all this opponent, but now the new king seem to be >>Junior 6a ! >>What do you think Enrique? > >I suspect that you are reading a lot more into this tournament than is possible. >Junior (by the SSDF) indeed looks very strong. But this tournament was at >fairly short time controls. Hence, the data is not at all commensurate with >SSDF testing [Though I am not sure you implied that]. According to both Enrique and Christophe the 40"/40 40"/40 40 as used in this tourney is just as suitable a time control as those used by the SSDF, to measure the strength of a program. Christophe stated 60 game, therefore I am somewhat extracting that he would also see these times the same way. Thanks. >If you look at the +/- >figures you will see that the winning margin is hardly conclusive. > >It does turn out that CT has a problem with repeating bad games. I expect it >will be fixed soon.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.