Author: Côme
Date: 23:16:12 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 20:43:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 16:15:20, Côme wrote: > >>On February 01, 2000 at 14:34:37, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2000 at 11:43:54, Côme wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>In this position : >>>>[D]r2qkb1r/pp1n1ppp/4n3/1B6/Q7/2N2P2/PP3P1P/R1B1K2R w KQkq - 0 1 > >00:00 6 (0) 1 -0.19 Bb5xd7 Qd8xd7 Qa4xd7 Ke8xd7 >00:00 8 (0) 1 0.46 O-O >00:00 112 (0) 2 0.07 O-O Bf8-d6 >00:00 597 (0) 3 0.35 O-O a7-a6 Bb5-d3 >00:00 1942 (0) 4 0.20 O-O a7-a6 Bb5xd7 Qd8xd7 Qa4xd7 Ke8xd7 Bc1-e3 >++ c1-e3 >00:00 4093 (0) 4 0.23 Bc1-e3 Ne6-c5 Qa4-d4 a7-a6 >00:01 11444 (540) 5 0.29 Bc1-e3 a7-a6 Bb5xd7 Qd8xd7 Qa4xd7 Ke8xd7 Ke1-e2 >00:03 34299 (1070) 6 0.02 Bc1-e3 a7-a6 Bb5xd7 Qd8xd7 Qa4xd7 Ke8xd7 O-O-O Bf8-d6 >++ c1-f4 >00:05 101207 (5754) 6 0.14 Bc1-f4 Ne6-c5 Qa4-c4 a7-a6 Bb5xd7 Qd8xd7 O-O >00:07 179795 (6376) 7 -0.11 Bc1-f4 a7-a6 Bb5-e2 Ne6xf4 Qa4xf4 Qd8-b6 Be2-c4 >++ c1-e3 >00:08 211403 (8694) 7 0.07 Bc1-e3 a7-a6 Bb5-d3 Ne6-c5 Be3xc5 Bf8xc5 O-O >++ e1-g1 >00:09 242393 (15721) 7 0.15 O-O a7-a6 Bb5-d3 Bf8-e7 Rf1-d1 Ne6-c5 Qa4-g4 Nc5xd3 >Rd1xd3 >++ c1-g5 >00:12 358864 (21763) 7 1.01 Bc1-g5 Bf8-e7 Bg5xe7 Qd8xe7 O-O-O Ra8-d8 Qa4xa7 >00:16 492023 (41491) 8 0.54 Bc1-g5 Ne6-c5 Bg5xd8 Nc5xa4 O-O-O Ra8xd8 Rh1-e1 Bf8- >e7 Bb5xa4 >00:24 873401 (45658) 9 0.38 Bc1-g5 Ne6-c5 Bg5xd8 Nc5xa4 O-O-O Ra8xd8 Rh1-e1 Bf8- >e7 Bb5xa4 g7-g5 >01:06 2527768 (92156) 10 1.18 Bc1-g5 Bf8-e7 Ra1-d1 Ne6-c5 Qa4-d4 f7-f6 Bg5-e3 a7 >-a6 Bb5-c4 b7-b5 >02:05 5006663 (399125) 11 1.26 Bc1-g5 Bf8-e7 Ra1-d1 Ne6-c5 Qa4-d4 f7-f6 Bg5-f4 a >7-a6 Bb5-c4 Nd7-b6 Qd4-e3 Qd8-c8 > >>>> >>>>After 8 min on my K6 II 350 Crafty 17.07 don't find Bg5!! >>>> >>>>Junior and Fritz find Bg5!! very quickly. >>> >>>What were the evals of the programs that found it? >>> >>>I am wondering if they really saw a win, or made (instead) a positional choice. >>> >>>Since the tactical payoff is 6 full-moves deep, it seems unlikely that most >>>programs will find the tactical reason quickly. >> >> >> >>Hello Dann, >>After some minutes the eval of Junior 6 is more than +1 on my K6 II 350. >>In human point of vue Bg5!! is winning but it is may be true than programs >>choose it but not for the right reasons. >>Best Regards >>Alexandre Côme Hello Vincent, Good eval but Diep don't find the strongest line! Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.