Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:49:41 02/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2000 at 15:31:14, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >Hi, > >strange things happen. Why did Nimzo call it a day and resign, when every other >engine I consulted evaluated this position as a perfect draw? Who is wrong, >Nimzo or the rest of the pack? > >Little Goliath 2000 V2.5 - Nimzo '99 >8/5pk1/8/7P/4K3/8/4B3/8 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Nimzo '99: > >59.h6+ Kxh6 60.Bd3 f6 61.Kf5 Kg7 62.Bc4 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:02 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 6/14 00:00:02 >59.Ke5 Kg8 60.Kf6 Kh7 61.Bd3+ > = (0.01) Tiefe: 6/14 00:00:02 > +- (6.23) Tiefe: 9/16 00:00:03 65kN >59.Kf5 > +- (6.24) Tiefe: 9/16 00:00:03 65kN >59.Ke5 Kg8 60.Kf6 Kf8 61.Bd3 Kg8 62.LB4 > +- (6.23) Tiefe: 9/16 00:00:03 65kN > +- (7.29) Tiefe: 20/36 00:07:26 273835kN > >(Schwartmann, Cologne 02.02.2000) > > >Andreas Haven't yet checked Nimzo 99 doing that now. But any human can see it is a draw, the bishop is the wrong color. Also most other engines have access to tablebases which I am certain will show it is a draw. I will check that too !!. Still strange it would resign as I did set up the final position after it's analysis prior to 62)LB4 as I didn't understand this move and after two minutes of this it sees no more than a draw. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.