Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:29:31 02/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2000 at 16:49:41, Chessfun wrote: >On February 02, 2000 at 15:31:14, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>strange things happen. Why did Nimzo call it a day and resign, when every other >>engine I consulted evaluated this position as a perfect draw? Who is wrong, >>Nimzo or the rest of the pack? >> >>Little Goliath 2000 V2.5 - Nimzo '99 >>8/5pk1/8/7P/4K3/8/4B3/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Nimzo '99: >> >>59.h6+ Kxh6 60.Bd3 f6 61.Kf5 Kg7 62.Bc4 >> = (0.00) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:02 >> = (0.00) Tiefe: 6/14 00:00:02 >>59.Ke5 Kg8 60.Kf6 Kh7 61.Bd3+ >> = (0.01) Tiefe: 6/14 00:00:02 >> +- (6.23) Tiefe: 9/16 00:00:03 65kN >>59.Kf5 >> +- (6.24) Tiefe: 9/16 00:00:03 65kN >>59.Ke5 Kg8 60.Kf6 Kf8 61.Bd3 Kg8 62.LB4 >> +- (6.23) Tiefe: 9/16 00:00:03 65kN >> +- (7.29) Tiefe: 20/36 00:07:26 273835kN >> >>(Schwartmann, Cologne 02.02.2000) >> >> >>Andreas > > >Haven't yet checked Nimzo 99 doing that now. >But any human can see it is a draw, the bishop is the wrong color. >Also most other engines have access to tablebases which I am >certain will show it is a draw. I will check that too !!. >Still strange it would resign as I did set up the final >position after it's analysis prior to 62)LB4 as I didn't >understand this move and after two minutes of this it sees no >more than a draw. >Thanks. I was wondering why the fen you posted shows score 0-1. Also in your game the position posted is LG to move so why would Nimzo at this point resign?. What move did it resign at?. Lastly which version of Nimzo 99 is this? Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.