Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Chris Carson (but relevant to the whole computer-chess community)

Author: John Warfield

Date: 01:57:46 02/03/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 02, 2000 at 16:38:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 02, 2000 at 16:12:58, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>
>>On February 01, 2000 at 22:31:17, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On February 01, 2000 at 17:27:20, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Chris,
>>>>	since you have collected the results of Rebel against strong human players at
>>>>standard time controls, for the next update could you please compute:
>>>>-Rebel's performance against players rated up to 2450
>>>>-Rebel's performance against players rated higher than 2450
>>>>	Thanks in advance,
>>>>José.
>>>
>>>
>>>BTW, since I haven't found any information on the DT Fredkin prize results,
>>>listing time controls, I asked the 'source'. The answer:  "all games for
>>>the Fredkin prize were played at 40/2hr or slower (sometimes 40/2.5 as was
>>>common a few years back.).
>>
>>	I played some games at that time control! I also played at 40 moves in 135
>>minutes. I loved adjournments, they helped me to improve as I was highly
>>motivated to analyze the adjourned positions, and they were quite common at
>>those time controls (I even had one game adjourned twice!).
>>
>>> _None_ of the games were played at any faster
>>>time control, as was stipulated by the original Fredkin Prize Rules."
>>>
>>>I assume that we can take that as factual, since the source was one of the
>>>deep thought team during the Fredkin prize "hunt".
>>
>>	Could you please be more specific? Who is the source?
>
>
>I could, but since he doesn't post here, I want to respect his privacy.  All
>I can say is that he was a member of the team during the "fredkin hunt".  I
>had thought that the fredkin rules said 40/2hr time controls to exclude action
>chess events, but wasn't sure.  He reminded me that this was indeed correct for
>_every_ game DT played that was counted for the Fredkin prize, which includes
>the 2650 TPR.  The 2551 did not 'win' the fredkin as USCF did count faster
>games.


 How convient of you to hide behind the cloak of protecting someonelses privacy
in order to avoid presenting the data.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.