Author: James T. Walker
Date: 18:40:43 02/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2000 at 17:42:59, Chessfun wrote: >On February 03, 2000 at 14:43:13, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Yesterday I played Rebel Tiger vs Fritz 5.32 some Bullet/blitz games to try to >>get a feel for which is stronger. I admit my format is a little strange but the >>results were interesting to me anyway. I only have a PII-333 and a K6-3-450 so >>I have to swap the programs for half of the games to be fair. This time I tried >>something a little different. I gave the program on the PII-333 3 min/game >>while I gave the program on the k6-450 only 2 min/game. The first 110 games >>Tiger had the K6-3-450 and Fritz 5.32 had the PII-333. The score of the first >>110 games was 60-50 favor Tiger. Of course I changed computers and tried again >>for another 110 games. The second score was 59.5-50.5 favor Fritz 5.32. So the >>totals were Chess-Tiger 110.5 to Fritz 5.32 109.5. I doubt if anyone wants to >>see the 220 games. One more thing, I played Fritz 5.32 without access to it's >>endgame CD. I thought it interesting that 50% more time failed to compensate >>for the 35% speed advantage. Maybe not enough games? >>Anyone care to comment? >>Jim Walker > >Hi Jim. > You should try this with H732. I once let it and F532 play >1600, one minute games. H732 scored over 1300 !!. >I wasn't proud to admit I run these types of games so I never >posted the result. It was just after someone here made a statement >on playing 1000 one minute games between these two programs. > >Let H732 try the Tiger....I would be interested in those results. > >Thanks. I have played several hundred games using auto232 and Hiarcs is definitely stronger than any other program I have at game/1min. My results vs Fritz were not as strong as yours but it was still around 70% for Hiarcs. Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.