Author: John Warfield
Date: 18:54:59 02/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2000 at 21:46:37, James T. Walker wrote:
>On February 03, 2000 at 19:57:52, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On February 03, 2000 at 19:55:06, John Warfield wrote:
>>[snip]
>>> What do you mean small sample? There are atleast 8 games between Karpov and
>>>computers which have been made public, Karpov is and was a 2700 rated player, if
>>>a 2700 rated player cannot defeat computers that are struggling to be recognized
>>>as 2500 players, I think it is a fair assumption to say that he sucks at playing
>>>against them.
>>
>>Not only is it not a fair assumption, it has no mathematical basis.
>>
>>In other words, it's a guess and {probably} a rather bad one at that.
>
>It's also a personal attack which is against the bylaws. Even if the person you
>are attacking does not post here there is no reason to allow personal attacks
>which have no real basis to begin with.
>Jim Walker
Please get a life! I merely stated a opinion regarding Karpov's playing skills
against a specific opponent. This is neither personal, or an attack. Simply a
stated belief. I have a right to believe someone is a bad player, without being
accused of attacking them right?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.