Author: John Warfield
Date: 18:59:24 02/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2000 at 19:57:52, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On February 03, 2000 at 19:55:06, John Warfield wrote:
>[snip]
>> What do you mean small sample? There are atleast 8 games between Karpov and
>>computers which have been made public, Karpov is and was a 2700 rated player, if
>>a 2700 rated player cannot defeat computers that are struggling to be recognized
>>as 2500 players, I think it is a fair assumption to say that he sucks at playing
>>against them.
>
>Not only is it not a fair assumption, it has no mathematical basis.
>
Not everything that is true can be proved mathematically. So what's your
point?
>In other words, it's a guess and {probably} a rather bad one at that.
That's your opinion I have another view.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.