Author: James T. Walker
Date: 14:58:46 02/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2000 at 16:47:55, Thorsten Czub wrote: >why don't you throw bones in the air ? >and watch how the fall on the floor ? >would spare earth much energy. I'm not interested in watching bones fall to the floor. > >you have 2 different machines, you play blitz, >you get the result: 50%. Is this a question? It makes no sense to me. > >why don't you test fritz6a ? I am also testing Fritz 6a but I can only run one test at a time. >why not on same machines? I prefer to let the programs run on different machines in a "Natural environment". >why not 40/120 or 40/40 or other sensible times? The SSDF is testing at 40/2 so why should I repeat their test. >why not less games and publish them ? It's simple. More games=more data. The games are available to anyone who ask for them. >the way you do it is wasting materialism IMO. I have no problem with you having your opinion. >you count numbers. count starts, therefore you don't need computers. I count wins/draws/losses, this is what most people do when trying to evaluate the relative strength of chess programs. >or count your money, like donald duck. It only takes about 1 minute to count my money. I didn't know Donald Duck played chess. Best regards, Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.