Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:47:08 02/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2000 at 17:58:46, James T. Walker wrote: >I'm not interested in watching bones fall to the floor. but it gives results ! you can measure it too. like fritz5.32 vs. rebel-tiger in blitz on different machine. is bone is different and unique :-)) >I am also testing Fritz 6a but I can only run one test at a time. what is the sense using fritz5.32 ? >I prefer to let the programs run on different machines in a "Natural >environment". "Natural environment" ?? sounds esoterical to me. is this a new sect you found ?? >It's simple. More games=more data. but the data you produce is worthless. > The games are available to anyone who ask >for them. like the data throwing bones in the air produces. anybody asking you for this data too ? >I count wins/draws/losses, this is what most people do when trying to evaluate >the relative strength of chess programs. what you measure has nothing to do with chess or chess-programs. or relative strength. you count numbers. like other people count stars, or sheeps. others money. but this has not much to do with chess. does it ? >It only takes about 1 minute to count my money. >I didn't know Donald Duck played chess. i didn't know what you do has anything to do with chess either. sorry. i am joking. in fact you beleive it HAS to do with chess or computerchess. ok. i remember there is a guy in rgcc who has a big chessbase database and he lets fritz analyze the whole database in second per move mode. do you believe he finds out anything relevent to computerchess or even chess ? no. so that is what you do. throwing bones in the air and counting the wins/losses/draws. you should read exupery. he has special chapter only written about people like you. :-))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.